Math Learn Direct Math
Math Learn Direct Save Mathlearndirect Math Id Components Com Performs Performs Php Math Learn Direct Effects of Popular and Classical Background Music on the Math Test Scores of
Undergraduate Students
Math Learn Direct Save Mathlearndirect Math Id Components Com Performs Performs Php Math Learn Direct
Performs nsearcho Com msearchnsearch |
| PP |
Php s Php asearchcsearchisearche Com r Performs hsearchssearcha Performs csearch2 Mathlearndirect e Math rsearchhsearch ksearchM Com tsearch Direct a Save ssearch%search3 Math B Math + Math y i Un Php v Math rsearchisearcha Save isearchzebrareeks%20cryptoh Learn sLearn+math+through+pornc Math l |
| PC |
Cognitive |
| YC |
When I study, listening to classical music interferes with my concentration. 1 = yes,
0 = no |
| YP |
When I study, listening to popular music interferes with my concentration. 1 = yes, 0
= no |
| CLASTST |
The math test score with classical background music |
| POPTST |
The math test score with popular background music |
| CONTST |
The math test score with no background music |
Tables 3 and 4 show the results of two regression analyses. The results indicated there
are no music listening style variables that have any statistically significant effect on
the test score difference for either the classical or the popular music listening
condition. CONTST has a statistically significant effect on the two dependent variables.
This may indicate that people who perform w ell in math also perform well studying math
under background music conditions.
Table 3
Regression Analysis for CLASTST Regressed on the Music Listening Style Scores for
Classical Music and CONTST
| |
DR |
Sum of Squares |
Mean Square |
| Regression |
6 |
152.75845 |
25.45974 |
| Residual |
42 |
123.48645 |
2.94015 |
| R Square = .55298 |
|
F = 8.65932 |
Sig F<.0001 |
| Variable |
B |
SE B |
Beta |
t |
Sig. t |
| CONTST |
.694126 |
.108881 |
.715638 |
6.375 |
.0000 |
| CI |
-.038022 |
.022374 |
-.199713 |
-1.699 |
.0966 |
| CC |
-.007180 |
.013090 |
-.077043 |
-.549 |
.5862 |
| CP |
-.002731 |
.023938 |
-.018487 |
-.114 |
.9097 |
| CE |
-.008017 |
.019952 |
-.077545 |
-.402 |
.6899 |
| CA |
.028530 |
.023452 |
.237064 |
1.217 |
.2306 |
| (Constant) |
4.777199 |
2.009605 |
|
|
Table 4
Regression Analysis for POPTST Regressed on the Music Listening Siyle Scores for
Popular Music and CONTST
| |
DF |
Sum of Squares |
Mean Square |
| Regression |
6 |
136.7454 |
122.79090 |
| Residual |
42 |
163.49948 |
3.89284 |
| R Square = .45545 |
|
F=5.85456 |
Sig. F = .0002 |
| Variable |
B |
SE B |
Beta |
t |
Sig. t |
| PE |
.016287 |
.024909 |
.146682 |
.654 |
.5168 |
| Pi |
-.001401 |
.019273 |
-.008721 |
-.073 |
.9424 |
| CONTST |
.699301 |
.127056 |
.691558 |
5.504 |
.0000 |
| PC |
.004390 |
.016337 |
.036949 |
.269 |
.7895 |
| pp |
-.026498 |
.03658.4 |
-.138622 |
-.724 |
.4729 |
| PA |
-.004486 |
.027663 |
-.032442 |
-.162 |
.8719 |
| (Constant) |
6.972756 |
4.639115 |
|
|
|
A t-test was used to analyze the differences among the test score means for CLASTST,
POPTST, and CONTST. Table 5 presents the comparison of math test score means and their
corresponding t-tests. The t-test revealed no statistically significant differences among
the three testing conditions. One may assume that the presence of either classical or
popular background music had no effect on the subjects' math test performance.
Table 5
Comparison of Math Test Score Means
| Variable |
Number of Cases |
|
Standard Deviation |
Standard Error |
| CLASTST classical) |
62 |
11.8387 |
2.681 |
.340 |
| POPTST (popular) |
62 |
12.0806 |
2.675 |
.340 |
| t = -.93 p=.354 |
|
|
|
|
| Variable |
Number of Cases |
|
Standard Deviation |
Standard Error |
| CLASTST (classical) |
66 |
11.8485 |
2.707 |
.333 |
| CONTST (control) |
66 |
12.0152 |
2.754 |
.339 |
| t = -.65 p =.517 |
|
|
|
|
| Variable |
Number of Cases |
|
Standard Deviation |
Standard Error |
| POPTST (popular) |
64 |
11.8438 |
2.779 |
.347 |
| CONTST (control) |
64 |
11.9375 |
2.822 |
.353 |
| t = -.33 p =.742 |
|
|
|
|
Table 6 presents the results of the post-hoc procedure where the variables YC
("When I study, listening to classical music interferes with my concentration")
and YP ("When I study, listening to popular music interferes with my
concentration") were coded 1 for a yes and 0 for a no response. 33% of the
respondents indicated that classical music interferes with their studying, while 43% of
the subjects indicated that popular music interferes with their studying. The variables
CLASTST and POPTST were then regressed on YC and YP respectively, Controlling for CONTST .
The variables YC and YP also had no statistically significant effect on, or correlation
with, CLASTST and POPTST respectively. Also, the various independent variables were tested
for interactions and curvilinearity, revealing no statistically significant results as
illustrated in Table 7.
Table 6
Post Hoc Results of the Effects of Students' Preferences for Study with Music on Math
Test Scores
Dependent Variable = POPTST
| |
DF |
Sum of Squares |
Mean Square |
| Regression |
2 |
136.36675 |
68.18338 |
| Residual |
46 |
163.87814 |
3.56257 |
| R Square = .45419 |
|
F = 19.13883 |
Sig F <.0001 |
| Variable |
B |
SE B |
Beta |
t |
Sig. t |
| YP |
-.451287 |
.545324 |
.090680 |
-.828 |
.4122 |
| CONTST |
.665412 |
.110802 |
.658044 |
6.005 |
.0000 |
| (Constant) |
4.300081 |
1.469611 |
|
|
|
Dependent Variable = CLASTST
| |
DF |
Sum of Squares |
Mean S!guare |
| Regression |
2 |
135.04316 |
67.52158 |
| Residual |
46 |
165.20174 |
3.59134 |
| R Square = .44978 |
|
F =18.80121 |
Sig F <.0001 |
| Variable |
B |
SE B |
Beta |
t |
Sio@'. t |
| YC |
.330808 |
.593371 |
.061592 |
.558 |
.5799 |
| CONTST |
.666549 |
.111715 |
.659168 |
5.967 |
.0000 |
| (Constant) |
3.981855 |
1.420960 |
|
|
|
Table 7
Correlation Coefficients of Classical and Popular Music Listening Styles
| CLASTST |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CA |
-.09 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CC |
-.08 |
.59 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| CP |
-.09 |
.73 |
.50* |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
| CT |
-.14 |
.35 |
.19 |
.20 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
| CE |
-.11 |
.77 |
.59* |
.78* |
.27* |
1.0 |
|
|
| YC |
.16 |
.08 |
-.01 |
-.15 |
-.02 |
-.21 |
1.0 |
|
| CONTST |
.71 |
.20 |
-.18 |
-.10 |
-.10 |
-.13 |
.07 |
1.0 |
| CLASTST |
CONTST |
CA |
CC |
CP |
CI |
CE |
YC |
|
| POPST |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PA |
-.12 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PC |
-.04 |
.36 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| PP |
-.01 |
.66 |
.46* |
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
| PI |
-.09 |
-.05 |
-.03 |
.01 |
1.0 |
|
|
|
| PE |
-.06 |
.77 |
.45 |
.75* |
-.07 |
1.0 |
|
|
| YP |
-.18 |
-.02 |
.27 |
-.02 |
.16 |
-.17 |
1.0 |
|
| CONTST |
.67 |
-.13 |
-.04 |
.01 |
-.11 |
-.10 |
-.11 |
1.0 |
| POPT ST |
CONTST |
PA |
PC |
PP |
PI |
PE |
YP |
|
p <.05
Conclusions and Discussion
cMath Learn Direct Save Mathlearndirect Math Id Components Com Performs Performs Php Math Learn Direct Effects of Popular and Classical Background Music on the Math Test Scores of
Undergraduate Studentsx l Math Learn Direct Direct
nMath Learn Direct Save Mathlearndirect Math Id Components Com Performs Performs Php Math Learn Direct Effects of Popular and Classical Background Music on the Math Test Scores of
Undergraduate Studentsk o Math Learn Direct